[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140825113740.d2bf59c3784ebab592bdf6e9@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 11:37:40 +1000
From: David Gibson <dgibson@...hat.com>
To: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, jasowang@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com,
vfalico@...il.com, edumazet@...gle.com, vyasevic@...hat.com,
hkchu@...gle.com, wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, xemul@...allels.com,
therbert@...gle.com, bhutchings@...arflare.com, xii@...gle.com,
stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] tuntap: Increase the number of queues in tun
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 19:07:20 +0530
Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com> wrote:
> Networking under kvm works best if we allocate a per-vCPU RX and TX
> queue in a virtual NIC. This requires a per-vCPU queue on the host side.
>
> It is now safe to increase the maximum number of queues.
> Preceding patches:
> net: allow large number of rx queues
> tuntap: Reduce the size of tun_struct by using flex array
> tuntap: Publish tuntap max queue length as module_param
>
> made sure this won't cause failures due to high order memory
> allocations. Increase it to 256: this is the max number of vCPUs
> KVM supports.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <dgibson@...hat.com>
--
David Gibson <dgibson@...hat.com>
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists