netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] r8152: firmware support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140825.000024.370420105630387444.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	hayeswang@...ltek.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, nic_swsd@...ltek.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] r8152: firmware support

From: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 06:43:02 +0000

> Except the step 3, 4, 6 and 7, the other steps depend on the
> context of the firmware. That is, for different firmware, some
> actions would be removed or added, and some settings would be
> different. Especially the step 8, it often different for
> different firmwares. Should I add some firmware version check
> in the source code?

This is extremely poor design of the firmware, adding such constantly
changing dependencies and constantly changing programming sequences
just to get the firmare executing is a terrible idea.

You really need to sanitize this in some way, because what you have
posted is totally unacceptable to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html