netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] bnx2x: `fixes' patch-series

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140825.173050.83808705245684919.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Ariel.Elior@...gic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] bnx2x: `fixes' patch-series

From: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:48:28 +0300

> This series contains mostly bug fixes, but never the less is intended
> for `net-next' and not `net', as:
>   - Some of the fixes are quite insignificant [`VF clean statistics',
>     `ethtool -d might cause timeout in log'].
>   - Some only recently were submitted to `net-next' [`Fix timesync endianity'].
>   - Some are not usually compiled as part of the kernel [`Fix stop-on-error'].
> 
> Dave - please consider applying this series to `net-next'; If you prefer,
> I can break this series into 2 parts [one for `net' and the other for
> `net-next'] - but personally I don't see much benefit in it.

Series applied to net-next, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html