[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140826142702.GA2346@ada>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:27:02 +0300
From: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, jiri@...nulli.us, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
duanj.fnst@...fujitsu.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
aruna.hewapathirane@...il.com, tim.gardner@...onical.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH] net: core: neighbour: Replace rcu_assign_pointer() with
RCU_INIT_POINTER()
According to RCU_INIT_POINTER()'s block comment 3.a, it can be used if
"3. The referenced data structure has already been exposed to readers either
at compile time or via rcu_assign_pointer() -and-
a. You have not made -any- reader-visible changes to this structure since
then".
These cases fulfill the conditions above because between the
rcu_dereference_protected() calls and the rcu_assign_pointer() calls there is
no update of those values.
Therefore, this patch makes the replacements.
The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used:
@@
@@
- rcu_assign_pointer
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER
(...,
(
rtnl_dereference(...)
|
rcu_dereference_protected(...)
) )
Signed-off-by: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@...il.com>
---
net/core/neighbour.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c
index 32d872e..a193932 100644
--- a/net/core/neighbour.c
+++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static int neigh_forced_gc(struct neigh_table *tbl)
write_lock(&n->lock);
if (atomic_read(&n->refcnt) == 1 &&
!(n->nud_state & NUD_PERMANENT)) {
- rcu_assign_pointer(*np,
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(*np,
rcu_dereference_protected(n->next,
lockdep_is_held(&tbl->lock)));
n->dead = 1;
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static void neigh_flush_dev(struct neigh_table *tbl, struct net_device *dev)
np = &n->next;
continue;
}
- rcu_assign_pointer(*np,
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(*np,
rcu_dereference_protected(n->next,
lockdep_is_held(&tbl->lock)));
write_lock(&n->lock);
@@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ static struct neigh_hash_table *neigh_hash_grow(struct neigh_table *tbl,
next = rcu_dereference_protected(n->next,
lockdep_is_held(&tbl->lock));
- rcu_assign_pointer(n->next,
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(n->next,
rcu_dereference_protected(
new_nht->hash_buckets[hash],
lockdep_is_held(&tbl->lock)));
@@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ struct neighbour *__neigh_create(struct neigh_table *tbl, const void *pkey,
n->dead = 0;
if (want_ref)
neigh_hold(n);
- rcu_assign_pointer(n->next,
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(n->next,
rcu_dereference_protected(nht->hash_buckets[hash_val],
lockdep_is_held(&tbl->lock)));
rcu_assign_pointer(nht->hash_buckets[hash_val], n);
@@ -2432,7 +2432,7 @@ void __neigh_for_each_release(struct neigh_table *tbl,
write_lock(&n->lock);
release = cb(n);
if (release) {
- rcu_assign_pointer(*np,
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(*np,
rcu_dereference_protected(n->next,
lockdep_is_held(&tbl->lock)));
n->dead = 1;
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists