[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53FCA3CF.4020103@mojatatu.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:12:15 -0400
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
CC: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
dborkman <dborkman@...hat.com>, ogerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
jesse@...ira.com, pshelar@...ira.com, azhou@...ira.com,
ben@...adent.org.uk, stephen@...workplumber.org,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, vyasevic@...hat.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, john.r.fastabend@...el.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, linville@...driver.com,
dev@...nvswitch.org, jasowang@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, ryazanov.s.a@...il.com,
buytenh@...tstofly.org, aviadr@...lanox.com, nbd@...nwrt.org,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, Neil.Jerram@...aswitch.com,
ronye@...lanox.com, Shrijeet Mukherjee <shm@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC 10/12] openvswitch: add support for datapath
hardware offload
On 08/26/14 11:01, Scott Feldman wrote:
>
>
> I don’t see it that way. I believe sw_flow can be the intermediary representation to span flow-based and non-flow-based HW,
> and from flow-based world and traditional l2/l3 world.
>
>
Is there more magic to this than what Thomas just presented in this thread?
cheers,
jamal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists