[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53FCAF6C.2070401@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 09:01:48 -0700
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ixgbe: flush when in xmit_more mode and under
descriptor pressure
On 08/26/2014 08:48 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> When xmit_more mode is being used and the ring is about to become
> full, enforce a tail pointer write to the hw. Otherwise, we could
> risk a Tx hang as pointed out by Alex.
>
> Suggested-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
> ---
> Hi Alex, something along that lines regarding your first comment?
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 67 +++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> index ba9ceaa..f851e84 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> @@ -6853,6 +6883,7 @@ static void ixgbe_tx_map(struct ixgbe_ring *tx_ring,
> u32 tx_flags = first->tx_flags;
> u32 cmd_type = ixgbe_tx_cmd_type(skb, tx_flags);
> u16 i = tx_ring->next_to_use;
> + bool desc_pressure;
>
> tx_desc = IXGBE_TX_DESC(tx_ring, i);
>
> @@ -6958,10 +6989,15 @@ static void ixgbe_tx_map(struct ixgbe_ring *tx_ring,
>
> tx_ring->next_to_use = i;
>
> - if (!skb->xmit_more) {
> + desc_pressure = (ixgbe_desc_unused(tx_ring) < DESC_NEEDED);
> + if (!skb->xmit_more || unlikely(desc_pressure)) {
> /* notify HW of packet */
> ixgbe_write_tail(tx_ring, i);
> +
> + if (unlikely(desc_pressure))
> + __ixgbe_maybe_stop_tx(tx_ring, DESC_NEEDED);
> }
> +
> return;
> dma_error:
> dev_err(tx_ring->dev, "TX DMA map failed\n");
> @@ -6978,6 +7014,7 @@ dma_error:
> }
>
> tx_ring->next_to_use = i;
> + ixgbe_maybe_stop_tx(tx_ring, DESC_NEEDED);
> }
>
Actually this bit here is much more complicated than it probably needs
to be.
My thought is to just fold ixgbe_maybe_stop_tx into the if statement.
So it shoudl be:
if (!skb->smit_more || ixgbe_maybe_stop_tx(tx_ring, DESC_NEEDED))
If the BQL bit is folded into the xmit_more check somewhere then that
should be enough to resolve any possible ring stalls.
Thanks,
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists