[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140825.180621.1003932711320755950.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ast@...mgrid.com
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
luto@...capital.net, rostedt@...dmis.org, dborkman@...hat.com,
chema@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
brendan.d.gregg@...il.com, namhyung@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 1/6] net: filter: add "load 64-bit
immediate" eBPF instruction
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:00:53 -0700
> add BPF_LD_IMM64 instruction to load 64-bit immediate value into a register.
I think you need to rethink this.
I understand that you want to be able to compile arbitrary C code into
eBPF, but you have to restrict strongly what data the eBPF code can get
to.
Arbitrary pointer loads is asking for trouble.
Instead I would rather you look into a model like what the quake
engine uses for it's VM.
Namely, the program can do loads and stores from/to a data section,
but all of them are validated to be in the range of the VM program's
image.
eBPF programs should only be able to access things using either:
1) Well defined entry/exit points for control transfer
2) Load/Store within a private limited data segment range used
only by the eBPF program
I don't want the eBPF program to be able to get "out of it's box"
in any way shape or form.
And besides, you're only making this thing as an optimization right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists