[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+mtBx8iv8tWU0mmEQEWxDfp614Hh=cQOpXqxSdhHaGsH6sBDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:40:48 -0700
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/8] net: Clarification of CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 6:13 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
>
>> @@ -569,16 +590,13 @@ struct sk_buff {
>> __u8 wifi_acked:1;
>> __u8 no_fcs:1;
>> __u8 head_frag:1;
>> - /* Encapsulation protocol and NIC drivers should use
>> - * this flag to indicate to each other if the skb contains
>> - * encapsulated packet or not and maybe use the inner packet
>> - * headers if needed
>> - */
>> + /* Indicates the the inner headers are valid in the skbuff. */
>> __u8 encapsulation:1;
>> __u8 encap_hdr_csum:1;
>> __u8 csum_valid:1;
>> __u8 csum_complete_sw:1;
>> - /* 2/4 bit hole (depending on ndisc_nodetype presence) */
>> + __u8 csum_level:2;
>> + /* 0/2 bit hole (depending on ndisc_nodetype presence) */
>> kmemcheck_bitfield_end(flags2);
>
> Crap, with xmit_more, this actually bleeds us over into a new __u8.
We'll undoubtably want to add more flags beyond that (they're quite
useful). I'll try to find some more space in the existing fields so we
don't increase skbuf size.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists