lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 26 Aug 2014 09:46:55 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <>
To:	Alexei Starovoitov <>
Cc:	Stephen Hemminger <>,
	"David S. Miller" <>,
	Linus Torvalds <>,
	Andy Lutomirski <>,
	Steven Rostedt <>,
	Daniel Borkmann <>,
	Chema Gonzalez <>,
	Eric Dumazet <>,
	Peter Zijlstra <>,
	Brendan Gregg <>,
	Namhyung Kim <>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,
	Kees Cook <>,
	Linux API <>,
	Network Development <>,
	LKML <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 4/6] bpf: enable bpf syscall on x64 and i386

* Alexei Starovoitov <> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Stephen Hemminger
> <> wrote:
> > Per discussion at Kernel Summit. Every new syscall requires
> > a manual page and test programs. We have had too many new syscalls
> > that are DOA.
> There is verifier testsuite that is testing eBPF verifier from userspace
> via bpf syscall. Also there are multiple examples and libbpf.
> I think test coverage for bpf syscall is quite substantial already.

This is in tools/bpf/, right?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists