| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1409154495-1343-3-git-send-email-christophe.gouault@6wind.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:48:15 +0200
From: Christophe Gouault <christophe.gouault@...nd.com>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Christophe Gouault <christophe.gouault@...nd.com>
Subject: [PATCH ipsec-next v3 2/2] xfrm: configure policy hash table thresholds by netlink
Enable to specify local and remote prefix length thresholds for the
policy hash table via a netlink XFRM_MSG_NEWSPDINFO message.
prefix length thresholds are specified by XFRMA_SPD_IPV4_HTHRESH and
XFRMA_SPD_IPV6_HTHRESH optional attributes (struct xfrmu_spdhthresh).
example:
struct xfrmu_spdhthresh thresh4 = {
.lbits = 0;
.rbits = 24;
};
struct xfrmu_spdhthresh thresh6 = {
.lbits = 0;
.rbits = 56;
};
struct nlmsghdr *hdr;
struct nl_msg *msg;
msg = nlmsg_alloc();
hdr = nlmsg_put(msg, NL_AUTO_PORT, NL_AUTO_SEQ, XFRMA_SPD_IPV4_HTHRESH, sizeof(__u32), NLM_F_REQUEST);
nla_put(msg, XFRMA_SPD_IPV4_HTHRESH, sizeof(thresh4), &thresh4);
nla_put(msg, XFRMA_SPD_IPV6_HTHRESH, sizeof(thresh6), &thresh6);
nla_send_auto(sk, msg);
The numbers are the policy selector minimum prefix lengths to put a
policy in the hash table.
- lbits is the local threshold (source address for out policies,
destination address for in and fwd policies).
- rbits is the remote threshold (destination address for out
policies, source address for in and fwd policies).
The default values are:
XFRMA_SPD_IPV4_HTHRESH: 32 32
XFRMA_SPD_IPV6_HTHRESH: 128 128
Dynamic re-building of the SPD is performed when the thresholds values
are changed.
The current thresholds can be read via a XFRM_MSG_GETSPDINFO request:
the kernel replies to XFRM_MSG_GETSPDINFO requests by an
XFRM_MSG_NEWSPDINFO message, with both attributes
XFRMA_SPD_IPV4_HTHRESH and XFRMA_SPD_IPV6_HTHRESH.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Gouault <christophe.gouault@...nd.com>
---
include/net/netns/xfrm.h | 10 ++++++
include/net/xfrm.h | 1 +
include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h | 7 ++++
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
5 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/netns/xfrm.h b/include/net/netns/xfrm.h
index 41902a8..9da7982 100644
--- a/include/net/netns/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/net/netns/xfrm.h
@@ -19,6 +19,15 @@ struct xfrm_policy_hash {
u8 sbits6;
};
+struct xfrm_policy_hthresh {
+ struct work_struct work;
+ seqlock_t lock;
+ u8 lbits4;
+ u8 rbits4;
+ u8 lbits6;
+ u8 rbits6;
+};
+
struct netns_xfrm {
struct list_head state_all;
/*
@@ -45,6 +54,7 @@ struct netns_xfrm {
struct xfrm_policy_hash policy_bydst[XFRM_POLICY_MAX * 2];
unsigned int policy_count[XFRM_POLICY_MAX * 2];
struct work_struct policy_hash_work;
+ struct xfrm_policy_hthresh policy_hthresh;
struct sock *nlsk;
diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
index 721e9c3..dc4865e 100644
--- a/include/net/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
@@ -1591,6 +1591,7 @@ struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx(struct net *net, u32 mark,
struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_byid(struct net *net, u32 mark, u8, int dir,
u32 id, int delete, int *err);
int xfrm_policy_flush(struct net *net, u8 type, bool task_valid);
+void xfrm_policy_hash_rebuild(struct net *net);
u32 xfrm_get_acqseq(void);
int verify_spi_info(u8 proto, u32 min, u32 max);
int xfrm_alloc_spi(struct xfrm_state *x, u32 minspi, u32 maxspi);
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h b/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h
index 25e5dd9..02d5125 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h
@@ -328,6 +328,8 @@ enum xfrm_spdattr_type_t {
XFRMA_SPD_UNSPEC,
XFRMA_SPD_INFO,
XFRMA_SPD_HINFO,
+ XFRMA_SPD_IPV4_HTHRESH,
+ XFRMA_SPD_IPV6_HTHRESH,
__XFRMA_SPD_MAX
#define XFRMA_SPD_MAX (__XFRMA_SPD_MAX - 1)
@@ -347,6 +349,11 @@ struct xfrmu_spdhinfo {
__u32 spdhmcnt;
};
+struct xfrmu_spdhthresh {
+ __u8 lbits;
+ __u8 rbits;
+};
+
struct xfrm_usersa_info {
struct xfrm_selector sel;
struct xfrm_id id;
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index e6ff7b4..55bcb86 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -566,6 +566,86 @@ static void xfrm_hash_resize(struct work_struct *work)
mutex_unlock(&hash_resize_mutex);
}
+static void xfrm_hash_rebuild(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct net *net = container_of(work, struct net,
+ xfrm.policy_hthresh.work);
+ unsigned int hmask;
+ struct xfrm_policy *pol;
+ struct xfrm_policy *policy;
+ struct hlist_head *chain;
+ struct hlist_head *odst;
+ struct hlist_node *newpos;
+ int i;
+ int dir;
+ unsigned seq;
+ u8 lbits4, rbits4, lbits6, rbits6;
+
+ mutex_lock(&hash_resize_mutex);
+
+ /* read selector prefixlen thresholds */
+ do {
+ seq = read_seqbegin(&net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.lock);
+
+ lbits4 = net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.lbits4;
+ rbits4 = net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.rbits4;
+ lbits6 = net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.lbits6;
+ rbits6 = net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.rbits6;
+ } while (read_seqretry(&net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.lock, seq));
+
+ write_lock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
+
+ /* reset the bydst and inexact table in all directions */
+ for (dir = 0; dir < XFRM_POLICY_MAX * 2; dir++) {
+ INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&net->xfrm.policy_inexact[dir]);
+ hmask = net->xfrm.policy_bydst[dir].hmask;
+ odst = net->xfrm.policy_bydst[dir].table;
+ for (i = hmask; i >= 0; i--)
+ INIT_HLIST_HEAD(odst + i);
+ if ((dir & XFRM_POLICY_MASK) == XFRM_POLICY_OUT) {
+ /* dir out => dst = remote, src = local */
+ net->xfrm.policy_bydst[dir].dbits4 = rbits4;
+ net->xfrm.policy_bydst[dir].sbits4 = lbits4;
+ net->xfrm.policy_bydst[dir].dbits6 = rbits6;
+ net->xfrm.policy_bydst[dir].sbits6 = lbits6;
+ } else {
+ /* dir in/fwd => dst = local, src = remote */
+ net->xfrm.policy_bydst[dir].dbits4 = lbits4;
+ net->xfrm.policy_bydst[dir].sbits4 = rbits4;
+ net->xfrm.policy_bydst[dir].dbits6 = lbits6;
+ net->xfrm.policy_bydst[dir].sbits6 = rbits6;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* re-insert all policies by order of creation */
+ list_for_each_entry_reverse(policy, &net->xfrm.policy_all, walk.all) {
+ newpos = NULL;
+ chain = policy_hash_bysel(net, &policy->selector,
+ policy->family,
+ xfrm_policy_id2dir(policy->index));
+ hlist_for_each_entry(pol, chain, bydst) {
+ if (policy->priority >= pol->priority)
+ newpos = &pol->bydst;
+ else
+ break;
+ }
+ if (newpos)
+ hlist_add_behind(&policy->bydst, newpos);
+ else
+ hlist_add_head(&policy->bydst, chain);
+ }
+
+ write_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&hash_resize_mutex);
+}
+
+void xfrm_policy_hash_rebuild(struct net *net)
+{
+ schedule_work(&net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.work);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_policy_hash_rebuild);
+
/* Generate new index... KAME seems to generate them ordered by cost
* of an absolute inpredictability of ordering of rules. This will not pass. */
static u32 xfrm_gen_index(struct net *net, int dir, u32 index)
@@ -2872,9 +2952,16 @@ static int __net_init xfrm_policy_init(struct net *net)
htab->dbits6 = 128;
htab->sbits6 = 128;
}
+ net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.lbits4 = 32;
+ net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.rbits4 = 32;
+ net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.lbits6 = 128;
+ net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.rbits6 = 128;
+
+ seqlock_init(&net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&net->xfrm.policy_all);
INIT_WORK(&net->xfrm.policy_hash_work, xfrm_hash_resize);
+ INIT_WORK(&net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.work, xfrm_hash_rebuild);
if (net_eq(net, &init_net))
register_netdevice_notifier(&xfrm_dev_notifier);
return 0;
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index d4db6eb..c6a7f44 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -964,7 +964,9 @@ static inline size_t xfrm_spdinfo_msgsize(void)
{
return NLMSG_ALIGN(4)
+ nla_total_size(sizeof(struct xfrmu_spdinfo))
- + nla_total_size(sizeof(struct xfrmu_spdhinfo));
+ + nla_total_size(sizeof(struct xfrmu_spdhinfo))
+ + nla_total_size(sizeof(struct xfrmu_spdhthresh))
+ + nla_total_size(sizeof(struct xfrmu_spdhthresh));
}
static int build_spdinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net *net,
@@ -973,9 +975,11 @@ static int build_spdinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net *net,
struct xfrmk_spdinfo si;
struct xfrmu_spdinfo spc;
struct xfrmu_spdhinfo sph;
+ struct xfrmu_spdhthresh spt4, spt6;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
int err;
u32 *f;
+ unsigned lseq;
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, portid, seq, XFRM_MSG_NEWSPDINFO, sizeof(u32), 0);
if (nlh == NULL) /* shouldn't really happen ... */
@@ -993,9 +997,22 @@ static int build_spdinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net *net,
sph.spdhcnt = si.spdhcnt;
sph.spdhmcnt = si.spdhmcnt;
+ do {
+ lseq = read_seqbegin(&net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.lock);
+
+ spt4.lbits = net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.lbits4;
+ spt4.rbits = net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.rbits4;
+ spt6.lbits = net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.lbits6;
+ spt6.rbits = net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.rbits6;
+ } while (read_seqretry(&net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.lock, lseq));
+
err = nla_put(skb, XFRMA_SPD_INFO, sizeof(spc), &spc);
if (!err)
err = nla_put(skb, XFRMA_SPD_HINFO, sizeof(sph), &sph);
+ if (!err)
+ err = nla_put(skb, XFRMA_SPD_IPV4_HTHRESH, sizeof(spt4), &spt4);
+ if (!err)
+ err = nla_put(skb, XFRMA_SPD_IPV6_HTHRESH, sizeof(spt6), &spt6);
if (err) {
nlmsg_cancel(skb, nlh);
return err;
@@ -1004,6 +1021,54 @@ static int build_spdinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net *net,
return nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
}
+static int xfrm_set_spdinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
+ struct nlattr **attrs)
+{
+ struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
+ u32 *flags = nlmsg_data(nlh);
+ u32 sportid = NETLINK_CB(skb).portid;
+ u32 seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq;
+ struct xfrmu_spdhthresh *thresh4 = NULL;
+ struct xfrmu_spdhthresh *thresh6 = NULL;
+
+ /* selector prefixlen thresholds to hash policies */
+ if (attrs[XFRMA_SPD_IPV4_HTHRESH]) {
+ struct nlattr *rta = attrs[XFRMA_SPD_IPV4_HTHRESH];
+
+ if (nla_len(rta) < sizeof(*thresh4))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ thresh4 = nla_data(rta);
+ if (thresh4->lbits > 32 || thresh4->rbits > 32)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ if (attrs[XFRMA_SPD_IPV6_HTHRESH]) {
+ struct nlattr *rta = attrs[XFRMA_SPD_IPV6_HTHRESH];
+
+ if (nla_len(rta) < sizeof(*thresh6))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ thresh6 = nla_data(rta);
+ if (thresh6->lbits > 128 || thresh6->rbits > 128)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (thresh4 || thresh6) {
+ write_seqlock(&net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.lock);
+ if (thresh4) {
+ net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.lbits4 = thresh4->lbits;
+ net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.rbits4 = thresh4->rbits;
+ }
+ if (thresh6) {
+ net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.lbits6 = thresh6->lbits;
+ net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.rbits6 = thresh6->rbits;
+ }
+ write_sequnlock(&net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.lock);
+
+ xfrm_policy_hash_rebuild(net);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int xfrm_get_spdinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct nlattr **attrs)
{
@@ -2274,6 +2339,7 @@ static const int xfrm_msg_min[XFRM_NR_MSGTYPES] = {
[XFRM_MSG_REPORT - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = XMSGSIZE(xfrm_user_report),
[XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = XMSGSIZE(xfrm_userpolicy_id),
[XFRM_MSG_GETSADINFO - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = sizeof(u32),
+ [XFRM_MSG_NEWSPDINFO - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = sizeof(u32),
[XFRM_MSG_GETSPDINFO - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = sizeof(u32),
};
@@ -2308,10 +2374,17 @@ static const struct nla_policy xfrma_policy[XFRMA_MAX+1] = {
[XFRMA_ADDRESS_FILTER] = { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_address_filter) },
};
+static const struct nla_policy xfrma_spd_policy[XFRMA_SPD_MAX+1] = {
+ [XFRMA_SPD_IPV4_HTHRESH] = { .len = sizeof(struct xfrmu_spdhthresh) },
+ [XFRMA_SPD_IPV6_HTHRESH] = { .len = sizeof(struct xfrmu_spdhthresh) },
+};
+
static const struct xfrm_link {
int (*doit)(struct sk_buff *, struct nlmsghdr *, struct nlattr **);
int (*dump)(struct sk_buff *, struct netlink_callback *);
int (*done)(struct netlink_callback *);
+ const struct nla_policy *nla_pol;
+ int nla_max;
} xfrm_dispatch[XFRM_NR_MSGTYPES] = {
[XFRM_MSG_NEWSA - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_add_sa },
[XFRM_MSG_DELSA - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_del_sa },
@@ -2335,6 +2408,9 @@ static const struct xfrm_link {
[XFRM_MSG_GETAE - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_get_ae },
[XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_do_migrate },
[XFRM_MSG_GETSADINFO - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_get_sadinfo },
+ [XFRM_MSG_NEWSPDINFO - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_set_spdinfo,
+ .nla_pol = xfrma_spd_policy,
+ .nla_max = XFRMA_SPD_MAX },
[XFRM_MSG_GETSPDINFO - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_get_spdinfo },
};
@@ -2371,8 +2447,9 @@ static int xfrm_user_rcv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
}
}
- err = nlmsg_parse(nlh, xfrm_msg_min[type], attrs, XFRMA_MAX,
- xfrma_policy);
+ err = nlmsg_parse(nlh, xfrm_msg_min[type], attrs,
+ link->nla_max ? : XFRMA_MAX,
+ link->nla_pol ? : xfrma_policy);
if (err < 0)
return err;
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists