netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 01/13] net: dsa: reduce number of protocol hooks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140827.162458.878869941352643208.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	alexander.h.duyck@...el.com
Cc:	f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linville@...driver.com, jhs@...atatu.com, alexander.duyck@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 01/13] net: dsa: reduce number of protocol
 hooks

From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 08:25:45 -0700

> Just a thought, you might want to consider using a protocol value other
> than ETH_P_DSA.  Maybe we should add a new value named ETH_P_XDSA for
> this approach since what we are doing is a multiplexed DSA protocol now.
> 
> This would allow for much easier back-porting of this if needed and also
> prevents us from possibly triggering any issues if there are any
> user-space APIs that might be trying to capture packets based on the
> protocol value.

Agreed, Florian can you respin this patch set using a newly allocated
ETH_P_* value for these new semantics?

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html