netdev - Re: RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv6/addrconf.c (1699)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHA+R7PLR7QHZuPriCErpuYL2_T+EiMhKF=qEKXjdgubno_StA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Aug 2014 15:54:48 -0700
From:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To:	Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Cc:	Tommi Rantala <tt.rantala@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, trinity@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv6/addrconf.c (1699)

On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net> wrote:
> 2014-08-29, 11:14:48 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Tommi Rantala <tt.rantala@...il.com> wrote:
>> > [   77.297196] RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv6/addrconf.c (1699)
>> > [   77.298080] CPU: 0 PID: 4842 Comm: trinity-main Not tainted 3.17.0-rc2+ #30
>> > [   77.299039] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
>> > [   77.299789]  ffff88003d76a618 ffff880026133c50 ffffffff8238ba79
>> > ffff880037c84520
>> > [   77.300829]  ffff880026133c90 ffffffff820bd52b 0000000000000000
>> > ffffffff82d86c40
>> > [   77.301869]  0000000000000000 00000000f76fd1e1 ffff8800382d8000
>> > ffff8800382d8220
>> > [   77.302906] Call Trace:
>> > [   77.303246]  [<ffffffff8238ba79>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x66
>> > [   77.303928]  [<ffffffff820bd52b>] addrconf_join_solict+0x4b/0xb0
>> > [   77.304731]  [<ffffffff820b031b>] ipv6_dev_ac_inc+0x2bb/0x330
>> > [   77.305498]  [<ffffffff820b0060>] ? ac6_seq_start+0x260/0x260
>> > [   77.306257]  [<ffffffff820b05fe>] ipv6_sock_ac_join+0x26e/0x360
>> > [   77.307046]  [<ffffffff820b0429>] ? ipv6_sock_ac_join+0x99/0x360
>> > [   77.307798]  [<ffffffff820cdd60>] do_ipv6_setsockopt.isra.5+0xa70/0xf20
>>
>>
>> I think we should just use rtnl_lock() instead of rcu_read_lock() there,
>> it is not a hot path worth optimization.
>>
>> Please try the attached patch.
>
> note: it doesn't build as it is now, it needs:
>
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_get_by_flags_rcu);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_get_by_flags);
>
>
> I just tried your patch with a basic test program (open
> socket/join/leave/close and open socket/join/close).
>
> I think you need to modify ipv6_sock_ac_close as well, or you can still
> trigger the assertion when closing the socket without leaving first.

You are absolutely right here.

Can I have your Signed-off-by and Tested-by before sending the patch
formally?

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html