netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] sched: replace bare printks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2929572.cMoKUE6Fhc@kerker>
Date:	Fri, 29 Aug 2014 22:12:04 +0200
From:	Michael Heimpold <mhei@...mpold.de>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] sched: replace bare printks

Am Freitag, 29. August 2014, 00:09:23 schrieb Stephen Hemminger:
> Don't use bare printk for error messages.
> Make GRED error an info level message rather than debug which
> is likely to be suppressed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
> 
> 
> --- a/net/sched/act_ipt.c	2014-03-28 11:40:43.000000000 -0700
> +++ b/net/sched/act_ipt.c	2014-08-22 16:53:33.676030680 -0700
> @@ -290,10 +290,10 @@ static int __init ipt_init_module(void)
>  
>  	ret1 = tcf_register_action(&act_xt_ops, IPT_TAB_MASK);
>  	if (ret1 < 0)
> -		printk("Failed to load xt action\n");
> +		pr_err("Failed to load xt action\n");
>  	ret2 = tcf_register_action(&act_ipt_ops, IPT_TAB_MASK);
>  	if (ret2 < 0)
> -		printk("Failed to load ipt action\n");
> +		pr_err("Failed to load ipt action\n");
>  
>  	if (ret1 < 0 && ret2 < 0) {
>  		return ret1;
> --- a/net/sched/act_mirred.c	2014-08-12 13:07:42.000000000 -0700
> +++ b/net/sched/act_mirred.c	2014-08-22 16:54:07.244031579 -0700
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int tcf_mirred(struct sk_buff *sk
>  
>  	dev = m->tcfm_dev;
>  	if (!dev) {
> -		printk_once(KERN_NOTICE "tc mirred: target device is gone\n");
> +		netdev_notice(dev, "tc mirred: target device is gone\n");
>  		goto out;
>  	}

At my first look, I was wondering whether this could work as 'dev' is not
a valid pointer inside the if statement body. But after trying to trace to call
down, I found that it ends up as
printk("%s(NULL net_device): %pV" ... 
within __netdev_printk.
Is this the desired output in this case?
Or did I miss anything?

>  
> --- a/net/sched/sch_gred.c	2014-03-28 11:40:43.000000000 -0700
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_gred.c	2014-08-22 16:54:47.720032663 -0700
> @@ -456,8 +456,8 @@ static int gred_change(struct Qdisc *sch
>  			if (table->tab[table->def])
>  				def_prio = table->tab[table->def]->prio;
>  
> -			printk(KERN_DEBUG "GRED: DP %u does not have a prio "
> -			       "setting default to %d\n", ctl->DP, def_prio);
> +			pr_info("GRED: DP %u does not have a prio "
> +				"setting default to %d\n", ctl->DP, def_prio);
>  
>  			prio = def_prio;
>  		} else
> 

Best regards,
Michael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html