[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140829201809.GH14753@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 16:18:09 -0400
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com,
raghuram.kothakota@...cle.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/2] sunvnet: Re-check for a VIO_DESC_READY data
descriptor after short udelay()
Upon encountering the first !VIO_DESC_READY in vnet_walk_rx(),
it is frequently worthwhile to re-check the descriptor status
after a short microsecond delay, as a bursty sender could
be actively populating the descriptors, and the short udelay()
is far less expensive than rolling back to ldc_rx() and having
to wake up and read data on another LDC message.
Signed-off-by: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
Acked-by: Raghuram Kothakota <raghuram.kothakota@...cle.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunvnet.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunvnet.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunvnet.c
index fc13b9c..7b1f320 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunvnet.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunvnet.c
@@ -398,6 +398,20 @@ again:
err = vnet_walk_rx_one(port, dr, start, &ack);
if (err == -ECONNRESET)
return err;
+ if (err != 0) {
+ /* The descriptor was not READY. Retry with a
+ * small delay, in case we have a bursty sender
+ * that is actively populating the descriptors, to
+ * reduce the overhead of stopping and re-entering
+ * which would involve expensive LDC messages.
+ */
+ if (retries++ < 3) {
+ udelay(4);
+ goto again;
+ } else {
+ break;
+ }
+ }
if (ack_start == -1)
ack_start = start;
ack_end = start;
--
1.8.4.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists