[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140901081343.GC12731@vergenet.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 17:13:45 +0900
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...ulusnetworks.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
dborkman <dborkman@...hat.com>, ogerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>,
Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
Andy Zhou <azhou@...ira.com>, ben@...adent.org.uk,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, vyasevic@...hat.com,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
john.r.fastabend@...el.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
John Linville <linville@...driver.com>,
"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>, jasowang@...hat.com,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
ryazanov.s.a@...il.com, buytenh@...tstofly.org,
aviadr@...lanox.com, nbd@...nwrt.org, Neil.Jerram@...aswitch.com,
ronye@...lanox.com, Shrijeet Mukherjee <shm@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC 10/12] openvswitch: add support for datapath
hardware offload
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:20:55AM -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> On 08/26/14 16:54, Thomas Graf wrote:
> >On 08/26/14 at 01:13pm, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> >>I think it's important distinction. In-kernel OVS is not OF.
> >>It's a networking function that has hard-coded packet parser,
> >>N-tuple match and programmable actions.
> >>There were times when HW vendors were using OF check-box
> >>to sell more chips, but at the end there is not a single HW
> >>that is fully OF compliant. OF brand is still around, but
> >>OF 2.0 is not tcam+action anymore.
> >>Imo trying to standardize HW offload interface based on OF 1.x
> >>principles is strange.
>
>
> I actually have no issues with whatever classifier someone decides
> to use. To each their poison. But I do take issue mandating the
> specified classifer it as THE CLASSIFIER as in this case,
> is where i start taking issue. I have a few things that i offload
> to hardware with speacilized classifiers such that i object strongly
> to the approach this driver has taken.
My reading of this thread is that allowing different classifiers
is not under dispute.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists