[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140901202851.GA1862@nanopsycho.lan>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:28:51 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...ulusnetworks.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
dborkman <dborkman@...hat.com>, ogerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>,
Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
Andy Zhou <azhou@...ira.com>, ben@...adent.org.uk,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, vyasevic@...hat.com,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
john.r.fastabend@...el.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
John Linville <linville@...driver.com>,
"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>, jasowang@...hat.com,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
ryazanov.s.a@...il.com, buytenh@...tstofly.org,
aviadr@...lanox.com, nbd@...nwrt.org, Neil.Jerram@...aswitch.com,
ronye@...lanox.com, Shrijeet Mukherjee <shm@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC 10/12] openvswitch: add support for datapath
hardware offload
Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 06:37:05PM CEST, jhs@...atatu.com wrote:
>On 09/01/14 04:13, Simon Horman wrote:
>>On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:20:55AM -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>
>>>I actually have no issues with whatever classifier someone decides
>>>to use. To each their poison. But I do take issue mandating the
>>>specified classifer it as THE CLASSIFIER as in this case,
>>>is where i start taking issue. I have a few things that i offload
>>>to hardware with speacilized classifiers such that i object strongly
>>>to the approach this driver has taken.
>>
>>My reading of this thread is that allowing different classifiers
>>is not under dispute.
>
>
>I am not sure how you reached that conclusion by reading this thread;->
>But i would be glad if that was the conclusion and i missed it.
Jamal, please be ensured that no one I know of is against future
different classifiers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists