[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140902165659.GH31516@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 12:56:59 -0400
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To: Raghuram Kothakota <Raghuram.Kothakota@...cle.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] sunvnet: Re-check for a VIO_DESC_READY data
descriptor after short udelay()
On (09/02/14 09:43), Raghuram Kothakota wrote:
> We could optimize this a bit by not wait for normal traffic, I mean,
> non-burst traffic
> and apply the retry only when we detect a stream of packets?
How could you tell the difference efficiently? You'd need to
track some kind of history/state for inter-packet arrival time.
All seems like over-kill (more useful to go and optimize other
parts of the system, such as do less work in interrupt context).
> We could detect a stream based on how many packets are picked
> up in this function, picking up 3 or more could be considered as a stream,
> of course tune based on testing.
>
> You probably tried it already, but checking to see if you tried with
> less number
> of iterations, we could reduce the iterations if the numbers are equally good
> with less iterations.
yes, the 3 * 4 micro-seconds was arrived at heuristically.
--Sowmini
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists