netdev - Re: RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv6/addrconf.c (1699)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:04:38 -0700
From:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Cc:	Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
	Tommi Rantala <tt.rantala@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, trinity@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv6/addrconf.c (1699)

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
<hannes@...essinduktion.org> wrote:
> Hi Cong,
>
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014, at 18:50, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
>> <hannes@...essinduktion.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Also rtnl_lock and rcu_read_lock compose in that order, so we don't need
>> > to change dev_get_by_flags, but as this is the only user it sure is
>> > possible. RCU locked version is just easier composeable, so I wouldn't
>> > touch that if needed in future, just also take rcu lock as before.
>>
>> There is no point to keep RCU read lock if we have rtnl lock,
>> I don't know why you don't want to change dev_get_by_flags(),
>> it is pretty easy to do since it only has one caller.
>
> I definitely don't have a problem cleaning this up in net-next. I wanted
> a minimal patch for stable because I didn't check history where and when
> additional users of dev_get_by_flags_rcu were removed.

`git grep` should show you we only have one caller. Apparently we don't
care about any out-of-tree module.

>
>> Even if you really need RCU in future, you are always welcome
>> to bring it back when you do, sorry we should never be blocked by
>> code NOT merged yet.
>>
>> >
>> > Also we should move ASSERT_RTNL checks from addrconf_join_solict to
>> > ipv6_dev_mc_inc/dec.
>> >
>>
>> Make it another patch.
>
> It is just one logical change, moving ASSERT_RTNLs to places where they
> better catch invalid callstacks.
>

Conflicts with what you claimed above. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html