netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] sunvnet: Re-check for a VIO_DESC_READY data descriptor after short udelay()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com
Cc:	raghuram.kothakota@...cle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] sunvnet: Re-check for a VIO_DESC_READY
 data descriptor after short udelay()

From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:27:54 -0400

> when there are no more packets coming, the extra 12 microsecond
> delay is not that big of a deal anyway.

How much other work could the cpu do in those 12 microseconds?

That's almost 3000 cpu cycles on a T4.

I understand your argument, and the fact that there are some existing
pieces of code doing this already, so I'll think about it some more.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html