[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1409694182.1034977.162882841.29AA6A80@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 23:43:02 +0200
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: bpf: make eBPF interpreter images read-only
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014, at 23:40, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 14:31 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>
> > > +static inline void bpf_prog_unlock_ro(struct bpf_prog *fp)
> > > +{
> > > + set_memory_rw((unsigned long)fp, fp->pages);
> >
> > why rw is needed?
> > since fp is allocated with vmalloc, vfree doesn't need
> > to touch the pages to free them, no?
>
> That assumes that vmalloc() do not have any debugging features, like
> poisoning content before freeing, to catch some use after free.
>
> Lets be clean and safe, and give back same memory permission we had
> after vmalloc()
Yes, I agree. I just went down the kmemleak codepaths and we certainly
don't want to cause issues in there if the implementation changes one
day.
Bye,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists