[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTScKSoEzTPpEEz8o8puiFbXgUnrk4q12W4eDBBPqX+EpXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:50:33 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net-timestamp: Merge shared code between phy and
regular timestamping
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(skb_complete_tx_timestamp);
> +
> +void __skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
> + struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *hwtstamps,
> + struct sock *sk, int tstype)
> +{
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> +
> + if (!sk)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * no hardware time stamps available,
> + * so keep the shared tx_flags and only
> + * store software time stamp
> + */
This comment only makes sense within the else {} clause. As a matter
of fact, I'd just drop it. The patch also inverts the branch. I would
keep the original order, as that is also the order in
skb_complete_tx_timestamp.
> + if (!hwtstamps)
> + orig_skb->tstamp = ktime_get_real();
> + else
> + *skb_hwtstamps(orig_skb) = *hwtstamps;
> +
Otherwise looks great to me. The code deduplicates shared code between
__skb_tstamp_tx and skb_complete_timestamp without introduces logical
changes to either codepath.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists