netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: filter: export pkt_type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:14:31 -0700
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:	Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@...tec.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: filter: export pkt_type_offset() helper

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 09/03/2014 11:08 PM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>>
>
>> +static int __init init_pkt_type_offset(void)
>>   {
>>         struct sk_buff skb_probe = { .pkt_type = ~0, };
>>         u8 *ct = (u8 *) &skb_probe;
>>         unsigned int off;
>>
>> +       pkt_type_offset = -1;
>>         for (off = 0; off < sizeof(struct sk_buff); off++) {
>> -               if (ct[off] == PKT_TYPE_MAX)
>> +               if (ct[off] == PKT_TYPE_MAX) {
>> +                       pkt_type_offset = off;
>>                         return off;
>> +               }
>>         }
>
>
> Why not BUG_ON() when pkt_type_offset could not be found?
>
> That way we would know that something is broken and you can
> spare the checks for negative offsets everywhere ...

also such BUG_ON will be right in the face, since the kernel
won't even boot :)
I guess we can only hit it if compiler changes and starts
doing crazing things with bitfields.
Eric, you're the original author of this function, thoughts?

>>         case SKF_AD_OFF + SKF_AD_PKTTYPE:
>> +               if (pkt_type_offset < 0)
>> +                       return false;

with BUG_ON we wouldn't need this check.

>>                 *insn = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_A, BPF_REG_CTX,
>> -                                   pkt_type_offset());
>> +                                   pkt_type_offset);
>>                 if (insn->off < 0)
>>                         return false;

and this one too.
and other checks in arch/*/jit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html