[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5406BC69.2090508@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 14:59:53 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mst@...hat.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Ingo Molnar jacob.e.keller@...el.com" <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: exit busy loop when another process
is runnable
On 09/03/2014 02:21 PM, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
> On 02/09/2014 09:31, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On 09/02/2014 02:03 PM, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
>>> On 02/09/2014 06:35, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>> Not sure whether this method will scale considering thousands of sockets
>>>> and processes.
>>> There may be millions of sockets, but in most cases only a handful of
>>> device queues per CPU to busy poll on. I have tested the epoll rfc
>>> code with hundreds of thousands of sockets and one or two device
>>> queues and is scales pretty well.
>>>
>>> The part I don't like in that code is the cumbersome mechanism I used
>>> to track the socket -> queue relationship. I think that if I had more
>>> time to work on it, I would instead look into extending the epoll
>>> interface so that libevent can tell the kernel what it wants, instead
>>> of having the busypoll code try and learn it.
>> I'd like to have a look at this rfc. Could you please give me a pointer?
>> I've done a quick search on kernel mailing list but didn't find it.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/21/192
>
> Cheers,
> Eliezer
> --
Thanks. I will have a look at this series.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists