[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140903102310.GA27002@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:23:10 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 2/3] qdisc: bulk dequeue support for qdiscs with
TCQ_F_ONETXQUEUE
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:22:42 -0700
> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 16:35 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> >
> > > This is crazy fast. This measurement is actually "too-high" as
> > > 10Gbit/s wirespeed is 14,880,952 (11049 pps too fast).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > This looks buggy, you forgot about GSO.
>
> The GSO check is (!skb->next), right(?)
No, you'd want to use skb_is_gso() helper.
> > Also, our idea was to use a byte count limit (aka BQL)
>
> It makes sense. I will look into using the BQL limits.
Thanks Jesper.
> > If we dequeue 8 64KB packets, this patch adds head of line blocking,
> > which we fought hard.
Just to make sure: Using bql limits would resolve your HOL blocking
concerns, right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists