netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net-timestamp: Make the clone operation stand-alone from phy timestamping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54089FD3.4000309@intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 04 Sep 2014 10:22:27 -0700
From:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, richardcochran@...il.com,
	davem@...emloft.net, willemb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net-timestamp: Make the clone operation
 stand-alone from phy timestamping

On 09/04/2014 09:44 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 12:21 -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>
>> In addition I have added a destructor named sock_efree which is meant to
>> provide a simple way for dropping the reference to skb exceptions that
>> aren't part of either the receive or send windows for the socket, and I
>> have removed some duplication in spots where this destructor could be used
>> in place of sock_edemux.
> This is an interesting idea but belongs to a separate patch ?
>

I suppose I can split it.  Expect v4 shortly.

Thanks,

Alex


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html