[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140904173040.7702.40237.stgit@ahduyck-bv4.jf.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 13:31:10 -0400
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: richardcochran@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, willemb@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 1/3] net-timestamp: Merge shared code between
phy and regular timestamping
This change merges the shared bits that exist between skb_tx_tstamp and
skb_complete_tx_timestamp. By doing this we can avoid the two diverging as
there were already changes pushed into skb_tx_tstamp that hadn't made it
into the other function.
In addition this resolves issues with the fact that
skb_complete_tx_timestamp was included in linux/skbuff.h even though it was
only compiled in if phy timestamping was enabled.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
---
v2: Dropped comment and restored original order based on comments
from Willem de Bruijn.
v3: No changes.
v4: No changes.
net/core/skbuff.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
net/core/timestamping.c | 29 ---------------------
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 53ce536..697e696 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -3511,33 +3511,13 @@ struct sk_buff *sock_dequeue_err_skb(struct sock *sk)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_dequeue_err_skb);
-void __skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
- struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *hwtstamps,
- struct sock *sk, int tstype)
+static void __skb_complete_tx_timestamp(struct sk_buff *skb,
+ struct sock *sk,
+ int tstype)
{
struct sock_exterr_skb *serr;
- struct sk_buff *skb;
int err;
- if (!sk)
- return;
-
- if (hwtstamps) {
- *skb_hwtstamps(orig_skb) =
- *hwtstamps;
- } else {
- /*
- * no hardware time stamps available,
- * so keep the shared tx_flags and only
- * store software time stamp
- */
- orig_skb->tstamp = ktime_get_real();
- }
-
- skb = skb_clone(orig_skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (!skb)
- return;
-
serr = SKB_EXT_ERR(skb);
memset(serr, 0, sizeof(*serr));
serr->ee.ee_errno = ENOMSG;
@@ -3554,6 +3534,45 @@ void __skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
if (err)
kfree_skb(skb);
}
+
+void skb_complete_tx_timestamp(struct sk_buff *skb,
+ struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *hwtstamps)
+{
+ struct sock *sk = skb->sk;
+
+ skb->sk = NULL;
+
+ if (hwtstamps) {
+ *skb_hwtstamps(skb) = *hwtstamps;
+ __skb_complete_tx_timestamp(skb, sk, SCM_TSTAMP_SND);
+ } else {
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ }
+
+ sock_put(sk);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(skb_complete_tx_timestamp);
+
+void __skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
+ struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *hwtstamps,
+ struct sock *sk, int tstype)
+{
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+ if (!sk)
+ return;
+
+ if (hwtstamps)
+ *skb_hwtstamps(orig_skb) = *hwtstamps;
+ else
+ orig_skb->tstamp = ktime_get_real();
+
+ skb = skb_clone(orig_skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (!skb)
+ return;
+
+ __skb_complete_tx_timestamp(skb, sk, tstype);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__skb_tstamp_tx);
void skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
diff --git a/net/core/timestamping.c b/net/core/timestamping.c
index a877039..f48a59f 100644
--- a/net/core/timestamping.c
+++ b/net/core/timestamping.c
@@ -63,35 +63,6 @@ void skb_clone_tx_timestamp(struct sk_buff *skb)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(skb_clone_tx_timestamp);
-void skb_complete_tx_timestamp(struct sk_buff *skb,
- struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *hwtstamps)
-{
- struct sock *sk = skb->sk;
- struct sock_exterr_skb *serr;
- int err;
-
- if (!hwtstamps) {
- sock_put(sk);
- kfree_skb(skb);
- return;
- }
-
- *skb_hwtstamps(skb) = *hwtstamps;
-
- serr = SKB_EXT_ERR(skb);
- memset(serr, 0, sizeof(*serr));
- serr->ee.ee_errno = ENOMSG;
- serr->ee.ee_origin = SO_EE_ORIGIN_TIMESTAMPING;
- skb->sk = NULL;
-
- err = sock_queue_err_skb(sk, skb);
-
- sock_put(sk);
- if (err)
- kfree_skb(skb);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(skb_complete_tx_timestamp);
-
bool skb_defer_rx_timestamp(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct phy_device *phydev;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists