lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 3 Sep 2014 22:41:48 -0700
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
	Chema Gonzalez <chema@...gle.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 net-next 2/4] net: filter: split filter.h and expose
 eBPF to user space

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 09/03/2014 05:17 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>
>> allow user space to generate eBPF programs
>>
>> uapi/linux/bpf.h: eBPF instruction set definition
>>
>> linux/filter.h: the rest
>>
>> This patch only moves macro definitions, but practically it freezes
>> existing
>> eBPF instruction set, though new instructions can still be added in the
>> future.
>>
>> These eBPF definitions cannot go into uapi/linux/filter.h, since the names
>> may conflict with existing applications.
>>
>> Full eBPF ISA description is in Documentation/networking/filter.txt
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
>
>
> Ok, given you post the remaining two RFCs later on this window as
> you indicate, I have no objections:
>
> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>

David,

I see that all 4 patches are marked as rfc, whereas I tagged
only 3 and 4 as 'rfc' and mentioned in cover letter that they
will be coming for real in stage III. Here they support patch 2
and show the future changes to bpf.h file.
Patches 1 and 2 are good to go.
Note that they're on top of Hannes's patch:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/385266/
Do you want me to resubmit just first two?

Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ