netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2] ipv6: fix rtnl locking in setsockopt for anycast and multicast

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140905.122539.670916286627732128.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	cwang@...pensource.com
Cc:	hannes@...essinduktion.org, sd@...asysnail.net,
	tt.rantala@...il.com, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org,
	yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, trinity@...r.kernel.org,
	davej@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] ipv6: fix rtnl locking in setsockopt for
 anycast and multicast

From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 12:23:37 -0700

> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
> <hannes@...essinduktion.org> wrote:
>>
>> What games are you playing? You know how patches are processed by David
>> and I even let him the choice by pointing out a problem in your patch so
>> that you could an update and send v2.
> 
> I assume David goes over all the discussion before applying any patch.
> So in the original discussion, obviously I disagree with your point on RCU,
> and sent my own version.

I thought the retention of RCU locking was reasonable, and that your
feedback was something I disagreed with.

This is different from ignoring your feedback.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html