[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1409951660.1177372.164202273.1FB2783A@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 23:14:20 +0200
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Ani Sinha <ani@...sta.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
matthew.leach@....com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, fenner <fenner@...sta.com>,
fruggeri <fruggeri@...sta.com>, travisb <travisb@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: socket: do not validate msg_namelen unless msg_name is
non-NULL
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014, at 23:00, Ani Sinha wrote:
> Hi guys :
>
> I am looking at the thread :
>
> [PATCH] net: socket: error on a negative msg_namelen
>
> and the patch that was submitted in that thread :
>
> commit dbb490b96584d4e958533fb637f08b557f505657
> Author: Matthew Leach <matthew.leach@....com>
> Date: Tue Mar 11 11:58:27 2014 +0000
>
> net: socket: error on a negative msg_namelen
>
>
> According to the linux recvmsg manpage, the caller of recvmsg() may
> set msg_name to NULL if he does not care about source address but the
> manpage does not say that one has to set msg_namelen to 0 in this
> case. Essentially msg_namelen is a don't care if msg_name is NULL. I
> think in the kernel, we should validate msg_namelen only if the caller
> has also set msg_name and return EINVAL only when msg_name is non-null
> and msg_namelen is negative.
>
> The following patch will do the intended :
>
>
> From ef8e8bd78635ac677f2d4b76fec9990ed1db763c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ani Sinha <ani@...stanetworks.com>
> Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 13:25:22 -0700
> Subject:[PATCH] net: socket: do not validate msg_namelen unless
> msg_name is non-NULL
>
> The value of msg_namelen in msghdr structure is irrelevant
> when msg_name is NULL. We should not validate the value
> passed in msg_namelen unless msg_name is non-NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ani Sinha <ani@...stanetworks.com>
> ---
> net/socket.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
> index 95ee7d8..a5dfe01 100644
> --- a/net/socket.c
> +++ b/net/socket.c
> @@ -1997,7 +1997,7 @@ static int copy_msghdr_from_user(struct msghdr
> *kmsg,
> if (copy_from_user(kmsg, umsg, sizeof(struct msghdr)))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> - if (kmsg->msg_namelen < 0)
> + if (kmsg->msg_name && kmsg->msg_namelen < 0)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (kmsg->msg_namelen > sizeof(struct sockaddr_storage))
The reason for the above mentioned commit was the signed/unsigned
conversion by this check. To not trigger any static checker tools, I
would suggest to just set kmsg->msg_namelen to zero in case msg_name is
NULL.
Thanks,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists