[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHNKnsRipRHicKOUW4dCutD1-sUG6qPnP2QuOveH_t1MFX9XgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 15:12:55 +0400
From: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@...il.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Jonathan Bither <jonbither@...il.com>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
ath5k-devel@...ema.h4ckr.net, open@...ke-m.de, list@...ke-m.de,
antonynpavlov@...il.com, openwrt-devel@...ts.openwrt.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/28] Remove ATHEROS_AR231X
Hello Paul,
2014-09-05 14:10 GMT+04:00, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>:
> Jiri, Nick, Luis, John,
>
> On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 13:46 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> Having this conversation every rc1 is getting a bit silly. Could Jiri
>> e.a. perhaps set some specific deadline for ATHEROS_AR231X to be
>> submitted?
>
> I waited until rc3. Have you seen any activity on this front? If not,
> should I resend the patch that removes the code in mainline that depends
> on ATHEROS_AR231X (ie, AHB bus support)?
>
Recent activity always could be found in [1]. Now I finish another one
round of cleanups and have a plan to fix several things (you can
always find something that you really want to improve). But if you
insist I could immediately switch to "send upstream" mode. And seems
that this would be better approach.
1. https://dev.openwrt.org/log/trunk/target/linux/atheros
--
BR,
Sergey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists