[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1409932350.26422.136.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 08:52:30 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rose: use %*ph specifier
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 18:32 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Instead of dereference each byte let's use %*ph specifier in the printk()
> calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> - Since v1:
> - compile tested
> - fix a wrong argument list
> net/rose/rose_link.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/rose/rose_link.c b/net/rose/rose_link.c
> index bc55142..e873d7d 100644
> --- a/net/rose/rose_link.c
> +++ b/net/rose/rose_link.c
> @@ -160,7 +160,8 @@ void rose_link_rx_restart(struct sk_buff *skb, struct rose_neigh *neigh, unsigne
> break;
>
> case ROSE_DIAGNOSTIC:
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "ROSE: received diagnostic #%d - %02X %02X %02X\n", skb->data[3], skb->data[4], skb->data[5], skb->data[6]);
> + pr_warn("ROSE: received diagnostic #%d - %3ph\n", skb->data[3],
> + skb->data + 4);
> break;
>
> default:
This looks better ;)
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists