[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140908.142143.807176983873922125.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 14:21:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: therbert@...gle.com, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] tcp: remove dst refcount false sharing for
prequeue mode
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 08:06:07 -0700
> @@ -1559,7 +1559,17 @@ bool tcp_prequeue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> skb_queue_len(&tp->ucopy.prequeue) == 0)
> return false;
>
> - skb_dst_force(skb);
> + /* Before escaping RCU protected region, we need to take care of skb
> + * dst. Prequeue is only enabled for established sockets.
> + * For such sockets, we might need the skb dst only to set sk->sk_rx_dst
> + * Instead of doing full sk_rx_dst validity here, let's perform
> + * an optimistic check.
> + */
> + if (likely(sk->sk_rx_dst))
> + skb_dst_drop(skb);
> + else
> + skb_dst_force(skb);
> +
This might not be a strong enough test.
We have to also make all of the checks that would cause the input
path to invalidate sk->sk_rx_dst too.
Otherwise, if it does, we'll crash when we try to do a dst_hold()
on skb_dst(skb) in sk->sk_rx_dst_set().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists