netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] inet: remove dead inetpeer sequence code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1410218247.11872.135.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Mon, 08 Sep 2014 16:17:27 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] inet: remove dead inetpeer sequence code

On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 19:08 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> inetpeer sequence numbers are no longer incremented, so no need to
> check and flush the tree. The function that increments the sequence
> number was already dead code and removed in in "ipv4: remove unused
> function" (068a6e18). Remove the code that checks for a change, too.
> 
> Verifying that v4_seq and v6_seq are never incremented and thus that
> flush_check compares bp->flush_seq to 0 is trivial.
> 
> The second part of the change removes flush_check completely even
> though bp->flush_seq is exactly !0 once, at initialization. This
> change is correct because the time this branch is true is when
> bp->root == peer_avl_empty_rcu, in which the branch and
> inetpeer_invalidate_tree are a NOOP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html