[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140907.212742.893555292268057160.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 21:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, therbert@...gle.com,
alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: refresh rt6i_genid in ip6_pol_route()
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 21:18:25 -0700
> On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 15:54 -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
>> This might be broken.
>>
>> We are dealing here with persistent entries in the ipv6 routine trie.
>>
>> If you just bump the genid on the next person to look it up, other
>> sockets and cached entities might not have validated the route yet,
>> and now will falsely see the route as valid. We have to ensure that
>> they too drop this route and perform a relookup.
>
> I am confused, I thought it was the role of the cookie.
>
> (Ie socket has to store its own cookie to be able to validate a route)
>
> Before 6f3118b571b8 patch, how was this done anyway ?
>
> If persistent routes cannot refresh the genid, then they are useless ?
I just speak about the genid aspect.
I understand that cookie (via node->fn_sernum) invalidates the path
in the fib_trie, but the genid protects against other circumstances
(matching IPSEC rule, f.e.)
You have to make sure all other sockets did a full route lookup
(including IPSEC) before you can safely adjust the genid.
I could be wrong, recheck my analysis please :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists