netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] sunvnet: Reduce LDC message overhead.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140908143802.GF31377@oracle.com>
Date:	Mon, 8 Sep 2014 10:38:02 -0400
From:	Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	raghuram.kothakota@...cle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] sunvnet: Reduce LDC message overhead.

On (09/04/14 22:37), David Miller wrote:
> 
> From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
> 
> > This patchset has an updated version of the v1 changes to reduce the
> > overhead from LDC messages. 
> 
> Let's hold on these changes until the memory barrier issues brought up
> by David is resolved.

On (09/07/14 16:19), David Miller wrote (in the patch 2/2 thread for this set):
> 
> > So what (if any) is the outstanding question about wmb() at this 
> > point?
> 
> I don't think there is any, thanks.

I'm not sure where we stand with this- do I need to resubmit any/all of 
those two patches?

--Sowmini

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html