lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 9 Sep 2014 17:39:52 +0300
From:	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, <wg@...ndegger.com>
CC:	<tony@...mide.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mugunthanvnm@...com>,
	<george.cherian@...com>, <balbi@...com>, <nsekhar@...com>,
	<nm@...com>, <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] can: c_can_platform: Fix c_can_hw_raminit_ti()
 and add timeout

On 09/09/2014 05:34 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 09/09/2014 04:31 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Pass the correct 'mask' and 'value' bits to c_can_hw_raminit_wait_ti().
>> They seem to have been swapped in the usage instances.
> 
> Can you split this fix into a seperate patch, please.

OK.

> 
>> TI's RAMINIT DONE mechanism is buggy and may not always be
>> set after the START bit is set. So add a timeout mechanism to
>> c_can_hw_raminit_wait_ti().
> 
> What should happen if the timeout occurs?

I'm not sure yet. I will verify if the hardware still works or not in that case.
If it doesn't work then we should fail.

cheers,
-roger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists