netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] sunvnet: Reduce LDC message overhead.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:04:34 -0400
From:	Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	raghuram.kothakota@...cle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] sunvnet: Reduce LDC message overhead.

Excuse me if I am missing something obvious, but what was the 
verdict on this? Is there any additional clarification/information 
I can provide, if this is being mulled over? 

--Sowmini

On (09/08/14 10:38), Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
> 
> On (09/04/14 22:37), David Miller wrote:
> > 
> > From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
> > 
> > > This patchset has an updated version of the v1 changes to reduce the
> > > overhead from LDC messages. 
> > 
> > Let's hold on these changes until the memory barrier issues brought up
> > by David is resolved.
> 
> On (09/07/14 16:19), David Miller wrote (in the patch 2/2 thread for this set):
> > 
> > > So what (if any) is the outstanding question about wmb() at this 
> > > point?
> > 
> > I don't think there is any, thanks.
> 
> I'm not sure where we stand with this- do I need to resubmit any/all of 
> those two patches?
> 
> --Sowmini
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html