[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1410372406.7106.31.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:06:46 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Robert Engels <rengels@...ionscity.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rtt vs. rcv_rtt ?
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 12:15 -0500, Robert Engels wrote:
> When using 'ss', both rtt, and rcv_rtt are reported.
>
> My understanding is that rcv_rtt is an estimate of the receivers rtt ?? Is
> this true? My assumption is that differences in rtt vs. rcv_rtt would be
> due to asymmetric networking connections ???
>
> Here is a sample 'ss' output:
>
> cubic wscale:2,9 rto:437 rtt:101.625/84 ato:40 cwnd:10 ssthresh:15 send
> 991.9Kbps rcv_rtt:18291 rcv_space:151142
>
> Can someone explain why the rcv_rtt would be so much higher than the rtt?
> Is it that the client is not reading the data fast enough? Other reasons?
>
> Thanks so much for your help.
rcv_rtt is not the rtt as you think it is ;)
rtt is the smooth rtt of delays between sent packets and received ACK.
But rcv_rtt is the time to receive one full window.
Its used by DRS (Dynamic Right-Sizing)
Check tcp_rcv_rtt_measure() & tcp_rcv_rtt_update() for details.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists