| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1410435523-7520-7-git-send-email-nikolay@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:38:42 +0200
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: vfalico@...il.com, j.vosburgh@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net,
davem@...emloft.net, Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 6/7] bonding: 3ad: convert to bond->mode_lock
Now that we have bond->mode_lock, we can remove the state_machine_lock
and use it in its place. There're no fast paths requiring the per-port
spinlocks so it should be okay to consolidate them into mode_lock.
Also move it inside the unbinding function as we don't want to expose
mode_lock outside of the specific modes.
Suggested-by: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c | 62 +++++++++++++----------------------------
drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.h | 1 -
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 8 +-----
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
index 1b19f35689a4..38fa749bf83b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
@@ -234,24 +234,6 @@ static inline int __check_agg_selection_timer(struct port *port)
}
/**
- * __get_state_machine_lock - lock the port's state machines
- * @port: the port we're looking at
- */
-static inline void __get_state_machine_lock(struct port *port)
-{
- spin_lock_bh(&(SLAVE_AD_INFO(port->slave)->state_machine_lock));
-}
-
-/**
- * __release_state_machine_lock - unlock the port's state machines
- * @port: the port we're looking at
- */
-static inline void __release_state_machine_lock(struct port *port)
-{
- spin_unlock_bh(&(SLAVE_AD_INFO(port->slave)->state_machine_lock));
-}
-
-/**
* __get_link_speed - get a port's speed
* @port: the port we're looking at
*
@@ -341,16 +323,6 @@ static u8 __get_duplex(struct port *port)
return retval;
}
-/**
- * __initialize_port_locks - initialize a port's STATE machine spinlock
- * @port: the slave of the port we're looking at
- */
-static inline void __initialize_port_locks(struct slave *slave)
-{
- /* make sure it isn't called twice */
- spin_lock_init(&(SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave)->state_machine_lock));
-}
-
/* Conversions */
/**
@@ -1843,7 +1815,6 @@ void bond_3ad_bind_slave(struct slave *slave)
ad_initialize_port(port, bond->params.lacp_fast);
- __initialize_port_locks(slave);
port->slave = slave;
port->actor_port_number = SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave)->id;
/* key is determined according to the link speed, duplex and user key(which
@@ -1899,6 +1870,8 @@ void bond_3ad_unbind_slave(struct slave *slave)
struct slave *slave_iter;
struct list_head *iter;
+ /* Sync against bond_3ad_state_machine_handler() */
+ spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
aggregator = &(SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave)->aggregator);
port = &(SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave)->port);
@@ -1906,7 +1879,7 @@ void bond_3ad_unbind_slave(struct slave *slave)
if (!port->slave) {
netdev_warn(bond->dev, "Trying to unbind an uninitialized port on %s\n",
slave->dev->name);
- return;
+ goto out;
}
netdev_dbg(bond->dev, "Unbinding Link Aggregation Group %d\n",
@@ -2032,6 +2005,9 @@ void bond_3ad_unbind_slave(struct slave *slave)
}
}
port->slave = NULL;
+
+out:
+ spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
}
/**
@@ -2098,7 +2074,7 @@ void bond_3ad_state_machine_handler(struct work_struct *work)
* by all (e.g., port->sm_vars). ad_rx_machine may run
* concurrently due to incoming LACPDU.
*/
- __get_state_machine_lock(port);
+ spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
ad_rx_machine(NULL, port);
ad_periodic_machine(port);
@@ -2110,7 +2086,7 @@ void bond_3ad_state_machine_handler(struct work_struct *work)
if (port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_BEGIN)
port->sm_vars &= ~AD_PORT_BEGIN;
- __release_state_machine_lock(port);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
}
re_arm:
@@ -2161,9 +2137,9 @@ static int bond_3ad_rx_indication(struct lacpdu *lacpdu, struct slave *slave,
netdev_dbg(slave->bond->dev, "Received LACPDU on port %d\n",
port->actor_port_number);
/* Protect against concurrent state machines */
- __get_state_machine_lock(port);
+ spin_lock(&slave->bond->mode_lock);
ad_rx_machine(lacpdu, port);
- __release_state_machine_lock(port);
+ spin_unlock(&slave->bond->mode_lock);
break;
case AD_TYPE_MARKER:
@@ -2213,7 +2189,7 @@ void bond_3ad_adapter_speed_changed(struct slave *slave)
return;
}
- __get_state_machine_lock(port);
+ spin_lock_bh(&slave->bond->mode_lock);
port->actor_admin_port_key &= ~AD_SPEED_KEY_BITS;
port->actor_oper_port_key = port->actor_admin_port_key |=
@@ -2224,7 +2200,7 @@ void bond_3ad_adapter_speed_changed(struct slave *slave)
*/
port->sm_vars |= AD_PORT_BEGIN;
- __release_state_machine_lock(port);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&slave->bond->mode_lock);
}
/**
@@ -2246,7 +2222,7 @@ void bond_3ad_adapter_duplex_changed(struct slave *slave)
return;
}
- __get_state_machine_lock(port);
+ spin_lock_bh(&slave->bond->mode_lock);
port->actor_admin_port_key &= ~AD_DUPLEX_KEY_BITS;
port->actor_oper_port_key = port->actor_admin_port_key |=
@@ -2257,7 +2233,7 @@ void bond_3ad_adapter_duplex_changed(struct slave *slave)
*/
port->sm_vars |= AD_PORT_BEGIN;
- __release_state_machine_lock(port);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&slave->bond->mode_lock);
}
/**
@@ -2280,7 +2256,7 @@ void bond_3ad_handle_link_change(struct slave *slave, char link)
return;
}
- __get_state_machine_lock(port);
+ spin_lock_bh(&slave->bond->mode_lock);
/* on link down we are zeroing duplex and speed since
* some of the adaptors(ce1000.lan) report full duplex/speed
* instead of N/A(duplex) / 0(speed).
@@ -2311,7 +2287,7 @@ void bond_3ad_handle_link_change(struct slave *slave, char link)
*/
port->sm_vars |= AD_PORT_BEGIN;
- __release_state_machine_lock(port);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&slave->bond->mode_lock);
}
/**
@@ -2495,7 +2471,7 @@ int bond_3ad_lacpdu_recv(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bond,
* When modify lacp_rate parameter via sysfs,
* update actor_oper_port_state of each port.
*
- * Hold slave->state_machine_lock,
+ * Hold bond->mode_lock,
* so we can modify port->actor_oper_port_state,
* no matter bond is up or down.
*/
@@ -2509,11 +2485,11 @@ void bond_3ad_update_lacp_rate(struct bonding *bond)
lacp_fast = bond->params.lacp_fast;
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
port = &(SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave)->port);
- __get_state_machine_lock(port);
+ spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
if (lacp_fast)
port->actor_oper_port_state |= AD_STATE_LACP_TIMEOUT;
else
port->actor_oper_port_state &= ~AD_STATE_LACP_TIMEOUT;
- __release_state_machine_lock(port);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
}
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.h
index bb03b1df2f3e..c5f14ac63f3e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.h
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.h
@@ -259,7 +259,6 @@ struct ad_bond_info {
struct ad_slave_info {
struct aggregator aggregator; /* 802.3ad aggregator structure */
struct port port; /* 802.3ad port structure */
- spinlock_t state_machine_lock; /* mutex state machines vs. incoming LACPDU */
u16 id;
};
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index e06251417a7d..116cf6965bc5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -1675,14 +1675,8 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev,
*/
netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
- if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD) {
- /* Sync against bond_3ad_rx_indication and
- * bond_3ad_state_machine_handler
- */
- spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
+ if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD)
bond_3ad_unbind_slave(slave);
- spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
- }
netdev_info(bond_dev, "Releasing %s interface %s\n",
bond_is_active_slave(slave) ? "active" : "backup",
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists