[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1410553099.2970.18.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 22:18:19 +0200
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...hat.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] ipv6: exit early in addrconf_notify() if IPv6
is disabled
Hi Cong,
On Do, 2014-09-11 at 15:07 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> If IPv6 is explicitly disabled before the interface comes up,
> it makes no sense to continue when it comes up, even just
> print a message.
>
> (I am not sure about other cases though, so I prefer not to touch)
>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
I checked the other notifier_blocks, I don't think we need to change
anything there.
disable_ipv6 is absolutely bad implemented. It should not be in the ipv6
procfs namespace at all. An inet6_dev must be available to manage this
knob! Thus we are automagically subscribed to all ipv6 LL multicast
groups.
I don't see any problems with this patch:
Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Thanks,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists