[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140915092405.124ff9d0@urahara>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 09:24:05 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...tta.com,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>,
Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] bridge: Some nice new things for vlan filtering
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 16:44:48 -0400
Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com> wrote:
> While working with vlan filtering and non-promisc mode, I've found
> myself wanting untagged traffic to automatically pass through the
> bridge. So I decided to introduce the concept of a per bridge default
> pvid. VLAN 1 is used as default pvid by default and can be changed
> by user through sysfs while vlan filtering is off. (I'll be adding netlink
> support now that Jiri Pirko kindly added the ifrastructure). Default
> pvid is assigned to all ports that do not assign their own pvid or
> already have a given vlan configured. This makes it very simple
> to enable vlan filtering on the bridge, not have to configure a thing,
> and still pass untagged traffic.
>
> The other small thing this series adds is automatic update of the
> vlan filter when vlan is configured on top of the bridge. In this
> case we automatically add the given vlan to the bridge filter list.
> The ports may still need to be updated as we don't know which ports
> are allowed to receive a given vlan.
>
> Thanks
> -vlad
>
> Vladislav Yasevich (3):
> bridge: Add a default_pvid sysfs attribute
> bridge: Add filtering support for default_pvid
> bridge; Automatically filter vlans configured on top of bridge
>
> net/bridge/br_device.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++---
> net/bridge/br_if.c | 2 +
> net/bridge/br_private.h | 35 ++++++++++++++-
> net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c | 17 +++++++
> net/bridge/br_vlan.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 5 files changed, 213 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
Please, no special VLAN 1, other equipment has that silliness.
Why is untagged traffic not treated as VLAN 0?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists