netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] bonding: style, comment and assertion changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140915.172049.2037428886134453050.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:20:49 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	nikolay@...hat.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, vfalico@...il.com, j.vosburgh@...il.com,
	andy@...yhouse.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] bonding: style, comment and assertion
 changes

From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:19:32 +0200

> This is a small and simple patch-set that doesn't introduce (hopefully) any
> functional changes, but only stylistic and semantic ones.
> Patch 01 simply uses the already provided __rlb_next_rx_slave function inside
> rlb_next_rx_slave(), thus removing the duplication of code.
> Patch 02 changes all comments that I could find to netdev style, removes
> some outdated ones and fixes a few more small cosmetic issues (new line
> after declaration, braces around if; else and such)
> Patch 03 removes one extra ASSERT_RTNL() because we already have it in the
> parent function and consolidates two other ASSERT_RTNL()s to the function
> that is exported and supposed to be called with RTNL anyway.

Series applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html