lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:00:37 -0400 From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com> To: Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@...il.com>, Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>, Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org CC: shemminger@...tta.com, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH 3/3] bridge; Automatically filter vlans configured on top of bridge On 09/16/2014 10:39 AM, Toshiaki Makita wrote: > (14/09/16 (火) 22:31), Vlad Yasevich wrote: >> On 09/16/2014 07:28 AM, Toshiaki Makita wrote: >>> On 2014/09/16 0:19, Vlad Yasevich wrote: >>>> On 09/14/2014 11:39 AM, Toshiaki Makita wrote: >>>>> (14/09/13 (土) 5:44), Vladislav Yasevich wrote: >>>>>> If the user configures vlan devices on top of the bridge, >>>>>> automatically set up filter entries for it as long as >>>>>> bridge vlan protocol matches that of the vlan. >>>>>> This allows the user to atomatically receive vlan traffic >>>>>> for the vlans that are convifgured. >>>>> >>>>> Changing br->vlan_proto seems to cause inconsistency between vlan >>>>> interfaces and filter settings. >>>>> Can we automatically change filters when setting vlan_proto? >>>>> >>>> >>>> I thought we already do that in br_vlan_set_proto()? Nothing >>>> here introduces any new kinds of issue with that code. >>> >>> I'm referring to a case like this: >>> 1. create br0.10 (802.1ad) >>> 2. change br->vlan_proto into 88a8 >>> >>> When creating br0.10 (1), br->vlan_proto is 8100 and different from >>> protocol of br0.10, so it is ignored by br_vlan_rx_add_vid(). >>> After changing br->vlan_proto (2), we might expect vlan 10 is not >>> filtered on br0, but it will be filtered. >> >> Ok, I see what you mean. This one is a bit tough. Our options are: >> 1) Return an error when configuring br0.10. This might break user-space. Not good. >> 2) Ignore protocol when crating the filter. This is not good either as the user >> may not switch the bridge vlan_proto value and we'd end up with a wrong filter. >> 3) Re-implement .1ad support per-vlan instead of per-bridge. >> >> You see another other alternatives? > > We might be able to configure filterings on changing vlan_proto. > 4) Memorize different protocol's filtering requests in > br_vlan_rx_add_vid() and use them when switching vlan_proto. If we do this, we might as well take it one small step further and make per-vlan protocol support. > 5) Scan vlan devices on bridge device when changing vlan_proto. > The scan could work... walk the upper devices looking for vlans and add/delete filters based on the protocol of the vlan devices. Seems kind of hacky, but let me give this one a try... -vlad > Thanks, > Toshiaki Makita > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists