netdev - Re: [Bridge] [PATCH 3/3] bridge; Automatically filter vlans configured on top of bridge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:00:37 -0400
From:	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
To:	Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@...il.com>,
	Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>,
	Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC:	shemminger@...tta.com, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH 3/3] bridge; Automatically filter vlans configured
 on top of bridge

On 09/16/2014 10:39 AM, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> (14/09/16 (火) 22:31), Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>> On 09/16/2014 07:28 AM, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>>> On 2014/09/16 0:19, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>>>> On 09/14/2014 11:39 AM, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>>>>> (14/09/13 (土) 5:44), Vladislav Yasevich wrote:
>>>>>> If the user configures vlan devices on top of the bridge,
>>>>>> automatically set up filter entries for it as long as
>>>>>> bridge vlan protocol matches that of the vlan.
>>>>>> This allows the user to atomatically receive vlan traffic
>>>>>> for the vlans that are convifgured.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changing br->vlan_proto seems to cause inconsistency between vlan
>>>>> interfaces and filter settings.
>>>>> Can we automatically change filters when setting vlan_proto?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I thought we already do that in br_vlan_set_proto()?  Nothing
>>>> here introduces any new kinds of issue with that code.
>>>
>>> I'm referring to a case like this:
>>> 1. create br0.10 (802.1ad)
>>> 2. change br->vlan_proto into 88a8
>>>
>>> When creating br0.10 (1), br->vlan_proto is 8100 and different from
>>> protocol of br0.10, so it is ignored by br_vlan_rx_add_vid().
>>> After changing br->vlan_proto (2), we might expect vlan 10 is not
>>> filtered on br0, but it will be filtered.
>>
>> Ok, I see what you mean.  This one is a bit tough.  Our options are:
>>   1) Return an error when configuring br0.10.  This might break user-space.  Not good.
>>   2) Ignore protocol when crating the filter.  This is not good either as the user
>>      may not switch the bridge vlan_proto value and we'd end up with a wrong filter.
>>   3) Re-implement .1ad support per-vlan instead of per-bridge.
>>
>> You see another other alternatives?
> 
> We might be able to configure filterings on changing vlan_proto.
> 4) Memorize different protocol's filtering requests in
> br_vlan_rx_add_vid() and use them when switching vlan_proto.

If we do this, we might as well take it one small step further and make per-vlan protocol
support.

> 5) Scan vlan devices on bridge device when changing vlan_proto.
> 

The scan could work...  walk the upper devices looking for vlans and add/delete filters
based on the protocol of the vlan devices.

Seems kind of hacky, but let me give this one a try...

-vlad
> Thanks,
> Toshiaki Makita
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html