[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54189C8E.5030409@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:24:46 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
jbottomley@...allels.com, fengguang.wu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -net] scsi: fix users of SCSI_FC_ATTRS to depend on NET
On 09/16/14 13:15, David Miller wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:35:21 -0700
>
>> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>>
>> There are other kconfig symbols which select SCSI_FC_ATTRS,
>> so they also need to depend on NET to fix kconfig warnings and
>> build errors:
>>
>> warning: (LIBFC && SCSI_IBMVFC && SCSI_QLA_FC && SCSI_LPFC && ZFCP && SCSI_BFA_FC && SCSI_CHELSIO_FCOE && FUSION_FC) selects SCSI_FC_ATTRS which has unmet direct dependencies (SCSI && NET)
>> drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c: In function 'fc_host_post_event':
>> drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c:543:7: error: 'scsi_nl_sock' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c: In function 'fc_host_post_vendor_event':
>> drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c:611:7: error: 'scsi_nl_sock' undeclared (first use in this function)
>>
>> Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com> [0-day test robot]
>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>
> Randy, this is starting to get convoluted.
Yes, I'm not happy about it either.
> It's pretty much pointless for SCSI_FC_ATTRS to depend on NET itself
> if we have to explicitly place a NET dependency on every single user
> of SCSI_FC_ATTRS.
>
> We have expressed a proper dependency for SCSI_FC_ATTRS only to have
> it forcefully bypassed by every single user because we 'select' it
> instead of using 'depends'.
>
> Can we just change these 'select' operations on SCSI_FC_ATTRS to just
> be 'depends' instead?
>
> I really wouldn't mind if select had the effect of force enabling the
> dependencies of the select'd Kconfig symbol. Then it really does what
> we use it for (keeping the user from having to know obscure
> dependencies just to enable the feature they want) without the ugly
> side effect of dependency bypassing.
>
> So a "select" would do a recursive "select" on all the dependencies
> needed to turn on the select'd object.
>
> I doubt it would even need to recurse often at all, the ways we use
> this is almost always to turn on some top level major piece of
> infrastructure.
>
> Anyways, that's a longer term thing and we need to fix this now, any
> opinions on just using 'depend SCSI_FX_ATTRS' to fix this?
typo: depends on SCSI_FC_ATTRS
No, I certainly have no objection and prefer depends over select anyway.
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists