| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:30:31 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Konstantinos Kolelis <k.kolelis@...rix.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>, <jmorris@...ei.org>,
<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, <kaber@...sh.net>,
<herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [BUG REPORT] Unencrypted packets after SNAT, allthough
IPSEC-Policies are present
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:04:07PM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:09:41AM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> > index beeed60..e041822 100644
> > --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> > +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> > @@ -2138,7 +2138,8 @@ struct dst_entry *xfrm_lookup(struct net *net, struct dst_entry *dst_orig,
> > xfrm_pols_put(pols, drop_pols);
> > XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMOUTNOSTATES);
> >
> > - return make_blackhole(net, family, dst_orig);
> > + err = -EREMOTE;
> > + goto error;
>
> We must return here, otherwise we drop some refcounts too much.
> I'll send an updated patch tomorrow.
>
Below is the updated version of the patch.
Subject: [PATCH] xfrm: Generate blackhole routes only from route lookup
functions
Currently we genarate a blackhole route route whenever we have
matching policies but can not resolve the states. Here we assume
that dst_output() is called to kill the balckholed packets.
Unfortunately this assumption is not true in all cases, so
it is possible that these packets leave the system unwanted.
We fix this by generating blackhole routes only from the
route lookup functions, here we can guarantee a call to
dst_output() afterwards.
Fixes: 2774c131b1d ("xfrm: Handle blackhole route creation via afinfo.")
Reported-by: Konstantinos Kolelis <k.kolelis@...rix.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
---
include/net/dst.h | 15 ++++++++++++++-
net/ipv4/route.c | 6 +++---
net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 4 ++--
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/dst.h b/include/net/dst.h
index 71c60f4..fa11c90 100644
--- a/include/net/dst.h
+++ b/include/net/dst.h
@@ -490,7 +490,16 @@ static inline struct dst_entry *xfrm_lookup(struct net *net,
int flags)
{
return dst_orig;
-}
+}
+
+static inline struct dst_entry *xfrm_lookup_route(struct net *net,
+ struct dst_entry *dst_orig,
+ const struct flowi *fl,
+ struct sock *sk,
+ int flags)
+{
+ return dst_orig;
+}
static inline struct xfrm_state *dst_xfrm(const struct dst_entry *dst)
{
@@ -502,6 +511,10 @@ struct dst_entry *xfrm_lookup(struct net *net, struct dst_entry *dst_orig,
const struct flowi *fl, struct sock *sk,
int flags);
+struct dst_entry *xfrm_lookup_route(struct net *net, struct dst_entry *dst_orig,
+ const struct flowi *fl, struct sock *sk,
+ int flags);
+
/* skb attached with this dst needs transformation if dst->xfrm is valid */
static inline struct xfrm_state *dst_xfrm(const struct dst_entry *dst)
{
diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index eaa4b00..173e7ea 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -2265,9 +2265,9 @@ struct rtable *ip_route_output_flow(struct net *net, struct flowi4 *flp4,
return rt;
if (flp4->flowi4_proto)
- rt = (struct rtable *) xfrm_lookup(net, &rt->dst,
- flowi4_to_flowi(flp4),
- sk, 0);
+ rt = (struct rtable *)xfrm_lookup_route(net, &rt->dst,
+ flowi4_to_flowi(flp4),
+ sk, 0);
return rt;
}
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
index 315a55d..0a3448b 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
@@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ struct dst_entry *ip6_dst_lookup_flow(struct sock *sk, struct flowi6 *fl6,
if (final_dst)
fl6->daddr = *final_dst;
- return xfrm_lookup(sock_net(sk), dst, flowi6_to_flowi(fl6), sk, 0);
+ return xfrm_lookup_route(sock_net(sk), dst, flowi6_to_flowi(fl6), sk, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ip6_dst_lookup_flow);
@@ -1041,7 +1041,7 @@ struct dst_entry *ip6_sk_dst_lookup_flow(struct sock *sk, struct flowi6 *fl6,
if (final_dst)
fl6->daddr = *final_dst;
- return xfrm_lookup(sock_net(sk), dst, flowi6_to_flowi(fl6), sk, 0);
+ return xfrm_lookup_route(sock_net(sk), dst, flowi6_to_flowi(fl6), sk, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ip6_sk_dst_lookup_flow);
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index beeed60..7505674 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -2138,7 +2138,7 @@ struct dst_entry *xfrm_lookup(struct net *net, struct dst_entry *dst_orig,
xfrm_pols_put(pols, drop_pols);
XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMOUTNOSTATES);
- return make_blackhole(net, family, dst_orig);
+ return ERR_PTR(-EREMOTE);
}
err = -EAGAIN;
@@ -2195,6 +2195,22 @@ dropdst:
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_lookup);
+/* Callers of xfrm_lookup_route() must ensure a call to dst_output().
+ * Otherwise we may send out blackholed packets.
+ */
+struct dst_entry *xfrm_lookup_route(struct net *net, struct dst_entry *dst_orig,
+ const struct flowi *fl,
+ struct sock *sk, int flags)
+{
+ struct dst_entry *dst = xfrm_lookup(net, dst_orig, fl, sk, flags);
+
+ if (IS_ERR(dst) && PTR_ERR(dst) == -EREMOTE)
+ return make_blackhole(net, dst_orig->ops->family, dst_orig);
+
+ return dst;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_lookup_route);
+
static inline int
xfrm_secpath_reject(int idx, struct sk_buff *skb, const struct flowi *fl)
{
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists