[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHA+R7NWzv8+2aUM1uQX8uZkQv-Dp9fYb0SNwmZqk3gKvXVWtw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:11:22 -0700
From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 2/2] net: sched: cls_u32 changes to knode must
appear atomic to readers
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:12 PM, John Fastabend
<john.fastabend@...il.com> wrote:
>
> -static int u32_destroy_key(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct tc_u_knode *n)
> +static int u32_destroy_key(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct tc_u_knode *n, bool pf)
> {
> tcf_unbind_filter(tp, &n->res);
> tcf_exts_destroy(tp, &n->exts);
> if (n->ht_down)
> n->ht_down->refcnt--;
> #ifdef CONFIG_CLS_U32_PERF
> - free_percpu(n->pf);
> + if (pf)
Nit: 'free_pf' is a better name than just 'pf'.
> + free_percpu(n->pf);
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_CLS_U32_MARK
> - free_percpu(n->pcpu_success);
> + if (pf)
> + free_percpu(n->pcpu_success);
> #endif
> kfree(n);
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void u32_delete_key_rcu_pf(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> +{
> + struct tc_u_knode *key = container_of(rcu, struct tc_u_knode, rcu);
> +
> + u32_destroy_key(key->tp, key, false);
> +}
I think you need a comment here to explain why you free it partially
on purpose, it is not that clear, at least I spent some time to figure
it out when I read your cls_tcindex patch.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists