[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140917223324.GK26828@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:33:24 -0400
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To: David L Stevens <david.stevens@...cle.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 net-next 0/3] sunvnet: add jumbo frames support
>
> arch/sparc/include/asm/vio.h | 44 ++++++++++-
> arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c | 2 +-
> arch/sparc/kernel/viohs.c | 14 +++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunvnet.c | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunvnet.h | 7 ++-
> 5 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
A logistical question- this patch-set spans both sparc-next/sparclinux
net-next/netdev, and there are obviously some dependancies here.
What's the prescribed way to handle this sort of thing?
(I ask, because I expect to soon be confronting a similar question with
some Rx side latency improvements that I'm working on, which will require
new functions for enabling/disabling interrupts in arch/sparc/kernel,
and I am wondering how that should get sequenced).
--Sowmini
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists