netdev - Re: bisected regression: 3c59x corrupts packets in 3.17-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140917125640.GA4213@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:56:40 -0400
From:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To:	mroos@...ux.ee
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, steffen@...ssert.de,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bisected regression: 3c59x corrupts packets in 3.17-rc5

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 03:43:54PM +0300, mroos@...ux.ee wrote:
> > Shit, you're right, sorry about that.  Its odd, I'm running it here, and its not 
> > causing problems, but thats obviously wrong.  Meelis, please add the above fix
> > to your test and confirm that it sovles the problem.  If you could keep the
> > previous patch in place too that would be great, as we should probably add the
> > dma error checking anyway.
> > 
> > 
> > [PATCH] 3c59x: Fix bad offset spec in skb_frag_dma_map
> 
> Tested 2 variants: only this patch (backported to old state) and both 
> patches together.
> 
> Both work fine.
> 
Thank you, Meelis.  Dave, I'll propose these patches officially in just a bit

sorry for the 
> -- 
> Meelis Roos (mroos@...ux.ee)
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html