netdev - Re: Question about synchronize_net() in AF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54199AC7.1040502@martingkelly.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Sep 2014 07:29:27 -0700
From:	Martin Kelly <martin@...tingkelly.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: Question about synchronize_net() in AF_PACKET close()

On 09/10/2014 02:37 PM, Martin Kelly wrote:
>> The synchronize_net() is also there to protect against the prot hook
>> which can run asynchronously from the core packet input path on any
>> cpu.
>>
> 
> Yes, understood. What I'm not clear about is whether it is safe to do
> the following:
> 
> unregister_prot_hook(sk, false);
> sock_orphan(sk);
> sock->sk = NULL;
> call_rcu(...);
> close socket, return to userspace
> 
> instead of
> 
> unregister_prot_hook(sk, false);
> synchronize_net();
> sock_orphan(sk);
> sock->sk = NULL;
> close socket, return to userspace
> 
> If you don't call synchronize_net() immediately, then other readers
> could see the protocol hook in the protocol list and try to use it.
> They could call into prot_hook.func. However, it appears that  such
> functions ( e.g. packet_rcv() ) touch the socket buffer but not the
> socket itself, so orphaning the socket before all RCUs have been
> processed is safe. In addition, no new packets will come in after
> packet_release() and touch the socket because the socket fd will be
> removed from the process fd list.
> 
> From my testing, I'm not seeing any obvious issues, but I could be
> missing something. Is orphaning the socket before all RCUs have
> finished unsafe?
> 

(friendly ping)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html