[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1411110263.7106.301.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:04:23 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: keep original skb which only needs header
checking during software GSO
On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 14:38 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Commit ce93718fb7cdbc064c3000ff59e4d3200bdfa744 ("net: Don't keep
> around original SKB when we software segment GSO frames") frees the
> original skb after software GSO even for dodgy gso skbs. This breaks
> the stream throughput from untrusted sources, since only header
> checking was done during software GSO instead of a true
> segmentation. This patch fixes this by freeing the original gso skb
> only when it was really segmented by software.
>
> Fixes ce93718fb7cdbc064c3000ff59e4d3200bdfa744 ("net: Don't keep
> around original SKB when we software segment GSO frames.")
>
> CC: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> ---
> net/core/dev.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index e916ba8..b7a0e1d 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -2694,10 +2694,12 @@ struct sk_buff *validate_xmit_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> struct sk_buff *segs;
>
> segs = skb_gso_segment(skb, features);
> - kfree_skb(skb);
> if (IS_ERR(segs))
>
> - skb = segs;
> + else if (segs) {
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + skb = segs;
> + }
> } else {
> if (skb_needs_linearize(skb, features) &&
> __skb_linearize(skb))
Good catch !
While we are at it, could you use consume_skb() instead of kfree_skb(),
and add missing {} (CodingStyle) ?
if (IS_ERR(segs)) {
segs = NULL;
} else if (segs) {
consume_skb(skb);
skb = segs;
}
Thanks !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists